Review: Inferno

I am currently basking in the glow of smug self-congratulation. I didn’t figure out the whole mystery in Dan Brown’s latest novel, but I figured out where the characters needed to be — and well over a hundred pages before the protagonist, Robert Langdon, did. I suspected it even earlier, but my personal confirmation still came well before Langdon sorted through everything. High fives all around!

Confession: I do feel a tiny bit like I cheated, though, simply because this mystery was firmly in my wheelhouse. My specialties are Medieval and Renaissance literature, as well as Ancient, Medieval, and Renaissance history, with a sub-specialty in history of the Crusades. Even more specifically, the disastrous 4th Crusade. No spoilers, but if you read this novel, you’ll see why I nailed it. Plus, on top of all that, I’ve even been to the place where I knew they needed to go. I have photos of it and everything.

InfernoPoint is, I felt right at home in Inferno. The novel features Robert Langdon, who Brown also chronicled in Angels & Demons, The Da Vinci Code, and The Lost Symbol. Out of the previous novels, my hands-down favorite was Angels & DemonsInferno is now a rather close second favorite, and it more than made up for my disappointment with The Lost Symbol.

The main plot of Inferno opens with Langdon’s mysterious awakening in Florence, Italy, after what seems to have been some sort of catastrophic incident in which he was non-fatally shot in the head. Langdon is suffering from retrograde amnesia, and has lost two days of his life. He has no idea what he’s doing in Florence, or why he’s carrying an artifact that doubles as a concealed projector of a painting depicting the levels of Hell described in Dante’s Inferno section of The Divine Comedy. Langdon soon finds himself groping blindly to figure out not only what he is investigating, but why. Along with a doctor who was treating him at the hospital, Langdon begins unraveling a complicated riddle centered on the famous poet Dante Alighieri and his enduring masterpiece, The Inferno.

Much like the previous novels, Langdon is a sort of academic James Bond. However, where The Lost Symbol veered too far into spy/action-hero territory, Inferno stays believable. Everything Langdon does has grounding in his background as a professor and well-known speaker and author, and the stunts he pulls — while impressive — are not out of the realm of possibility for any fit adult. Langdon focuses on the mysteries embedded in the poem and the myriad art it inspired. The number of parties involved in the hunt is large, and their allegiances shift more times than I could count. Hidden motives abound. There are twists upon twists, and just when you think you’ve got it all figured out, Brown yanks the rug out from under you by revealing yet another red herring. While I did guess the correct location, the characters, I admit, stumped me; the final reveal caught me quite off-guard.

I enjoyed Inferno immensely, and not just because the mystery fell within my areas of study and (minor) expertise. The novel is smart, fast-paced, and engaging. It manages to be thrilling both in terms of pure entertainment and the scholarly bent for which Brown has become famous. Each of his novels feels like a tour through the various locations, and I always come away with a vivid impression of the art, architecture, and culture of the novel’s respective city or cities. Personally, I think this is one of the best things Brown has written to date.  In a recent interview, Brown discussed his writing methodology, part of which is a focus on what he withholds from readers, saying, “A reader’s desire to guess what I’ve hidden is always more exciting than anything I can show.”

Dan Brown certainly kept me guessing, and kept me hooked. This novel is a continuation of the best traits of his earlier novels, and happily it purges the excesses that plagued The Lost Symbol. On top of the surface entertainment value, Brown poses some very interesting ethical questions, and draws readers’ attention to some serious issues that the world is facing today. Even after finishing the novel, I’ve been thinking — and thinking hard — about the problems highlighted, and the potential solutions proposed by the various characters. The novel ends without definitely answering any of the questions, so I feel safe in assuming that I’m doing exactly what Brown wants from his readers: thinking about not only the novel, but the broad implications of a pressing social issue. Kudos to Brown for both the novel and the considerations that I’m sure I’ll be mulling for some time to come.

Happy Reading!

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Book Review

4 responses to “Review: Inferno

  1. Thank you for the review. I was thinking of buying this book when I passed the bookstore today, but my shelves are full with unread books already, so I decided against it. I’ve always found Brown’s book to be page-turners, but unfortunately they are a bit shallow. Your review of Inferno is therefore, a bit surprising and intriguing to me—that bit about the “social issues.” I’m seriously considering to buy it now. By the way, I take it you don’t recommend The Lost Symbol?

    Before the movie came out, I had always thought of Robert Langdon as a version of Indiana Jones, you know. So I was a bit disappointed when Tom Hanks played him instead of Harrison Ford. 🙂

    • Agreed on all points! I typically enjoy Dan Brown’s novels for the entertainment value, rather than the depth of thinking they provoke. This one, though, does dip into some heavy issues — hopefully you’ll agree with my take, and enjoy the provocative questions Brown raises.

      And yes, you’re correct that I don’t particularly recommend The Lost Symbol; I just found it to exceed even my suspension of disbelief. It was shallow, all flash and no substance.

      Also, I totally agree with your casting call! I don’t think Tom Hanks was the right actor for the role, and especially given the fact that Brown himself described Langdon as “Indiana Jones in tweed”, Harrison Ford would have been great!

  2. I don’t really read much fiction, but Dan Brown is a notable exception. Unlike music and comedy, I find that I get bored after reading 3 or so of the books. I really started digging Michener about 3 years ago, but after 3 or 4 I got sick of the familiar style. I will read INFERNO just for closure.
    That’s why I’m going to stop writing after my 5th or so book. I’ll be content w/ my Nobel Prize(s) by then.

    • I think that the boredom factor is why I fly through so many books in different genres and styles. Also, sometimes I think that after a massively successful book, authors will occasionally rest on their laurels and rely on their name and the previous novel’s popularity rather than producing another work of the highest quality they can. I agree, both readers and authors need to keep things fresh!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s